Attorney Susan Chana Lask Defends Traffic Violations
News New York Traffic Attorney Susan Chana Lask  Email Newsletters
 Make NYPOST.COM
Your Homepage
HOME  |  NEWS  |  COLUMNISTS  |  SPORTS  |  GOSSIP  |  POST OPINION  |  BUSINESS  |  ENTERTAINMENT
NEWS
 Regional News
 National News
 World News
 NYPOST.COM
 Home
 Archives
 Last 7 Days
 Breaking News
 Business
 Cartoons
 Classified
 Columnists
 Coupons
 Entertainment
 Gossip
 Home Delivery
 Horoscope
 Learning Center
 Lifestyle
 Lottery
 News
 NYC Rental Listings
 PageSix.com
 Parenting
 Post Opinion
 Post Store
 Puzzles
 Real Estate
 Reviews
 Shopping
 Sports
 Story Index
 Traffic
 Travel
 TV Listings
 Weather
 SEARCH
 Contact Us
 Job Openings
 News Corp Sites
 Online Media Kit
 Print Media Kit
 Privacy Policy
 Terms of Use
 
Regional News
MOVING 'VIOLATION'
By AL GUART
New York Traffic Court Attorney Susan Chana Lask protects rights of New York drivers OUT OF CITE:
Lawyer Susan Chana Lask says client Patrice Paul's ticket is voided because his "violation" doesn't apply in the city.
- Michael Sofronski

November 3, 2002 --

Some city drivers may have been charged and convicted under a state traffic law that was voided in the five boroughs four years ago, The Post has learned.

Tickets issued by city traffic cops regularly cite a violation of the state Vehicle and Traffic Law section 1180 (a). But that statute was wiped out for offenses within the city limits in an amendment to the law made on Dec. 23, 1998.

The statute, which still applies in other parts of the state, cites drivers who move at a "speed not reasonable or prudent" and allows for fines that range from $40 to $150.

One city driver hit with a 1180 (a) citation was Patrice Paul, 35, a Brooklyn auto mechanic, who was pulled over near JFK Airport last May 23. He was given a ticket because cops said he had exceeded the 35 mph speed limit.

Paul, a Guyanese national, has appeared four times in a DMV hearing room in Queens to contest the validity of the ticket.

"If the law is not valid, you cannot charge someone with it," Paul added. "They should get their act together."

Paul hired lawyer Susan Chana Lask, who argued in traffic court last Oct. 21 that the summons be dismissed since the law was void in the city.

But a state traffic judge balked, and the case was adjourned.

State Department of Motor Vehicles judges argued they can and do convict city drivers under law 1180 (a) because it mirrors a city traffic regulation.

The city rule, NYCRR 4-06 (a), sets the speed limit at 30 miles per hour and requires drivers to move at a "reasonable or prudent" speed in order to avoid accidents.

"It doesn't make a difference which section the ticket's written under," said supervising judge Leon Schulgasser. "The net result is the same, and our (DMV) appeals board has upheld that."

Lask plans to file a class-action suit this week on behalf of drivers who paid fines or had their licenses revoked or suspended based on 1180 (a) convictions.

"People are being convicted under a law that was repealed here four years ago, and the state is collecting money," Lask said.

At stake are millions in fines that the city and state have collected over the years.

Records show 14,817 drivers across the state were ticketed on a 1180 (a) violation last year, although the figures do not indicate how many of those fined were stopped within New York City limits.

Former police Officer Sergio Villaverde, a lawyer who represents drivers, suspects the confusion of law 1180 (a) is partly because some city traffic cops refer to outdated "summons cards" that still contain the repealed statute.

"The NYPD needs to update the summons cards," Villaverde said.

The NYPD declined comment.


printer Print this story document Previous articles on this topic
copyright Click for permission to reprint


Back to Regional News Index | Home

NEW YORK POST is a registered trademark of NYP Holdings, Inc. NYPOST.COM, NYPOSTONLINE.COM, and NEWYORKPOST.COM are trademarks of NYP Holdings, Inc. Copyright 2002 NYP Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
line


PageSix